# Rothfuss v. Public Service Railway Co.

> Supreme Court of New Jersey · June 26, 1923 · 98 N.J.L. 896

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8273939

## Case

- **Full name:** KATHRYN ROTHFUSS, BY HER FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, ALFRED ROTHFUSS, AND ALFRED ROTHFUSS, IN HIS OWN RIGHT v. PUBLIC SERVICE RAILWAY COMPANY
- **Court:** Supreme Court of New Jersey
- **Decided:** June 26, 1923
- **Citations:** 98 N.J.L. 896; 121 A. 724; 1923 N.J. LEXIS 305
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Walker
- **Judges:** Walker
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8273939

## Opinion text

Walker, Chancellor
(dissenting). I dissent from the opinion in so far as it says that the judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court concerning the charge to the jury, as I think the charge is right and that the Supreme Court’s judgment of reversal should be itself reversed. So far as the practice questions are concerned, I concur in the opinion.
Justices Kalisch and Black authorize me to say that they concur in this view.
For affirmance — Parker, Bergen, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 7.
For reversal — The Chancellor, Kalisch, Black, JJ. 3.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8273939. Public record. Not legal advice.