# Hulme v. Donnelly

> Supreme Court of New Jersey · February 28, 1921 · 95 N.J.L. 545

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8273700

## Case

- **Full name:** FREDERIC L. HULME v. FREDERICK W. DONNELLY, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF TRENTON
- **Court:** Supreme Court of New Jersey
- **Decided:** February 28, 1921
- **Citations:** 95 N.J.L. 545; 112 A. 498; 1921 N.J. LEXIS 148
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Cueiajvl
- **Judges:** Affirmance, Aokbrson, Bergen, Chancedlor, Cueiajvl, Gardner, Heppüntieimer, Justioe, Kadiscií, Kat, Mlntürn, None, Parker, Reversal, Taylor, Trexcirard, White, Williams, Zenbacu
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8273700

## Opinion text

Per Cueiajvl
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The ChaNCedloR, Chief Justioe, TREXCirARD, PARKER, BERGEN, MlNTÜRN, KaDISCIÍ, KaT-zeNBACU, White, HeppüNTIeimer, WilliaMS, Taylor, GARDNER, AOKBRSON, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8273700. Public record. Not legal advice.