# West Shore Railroad v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

> Supreme Court of New Jersey · February 6, 1919 · 92 N.J.L. 648

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8273527

## Case

- **Full name:** WEST SHORE RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT, RESPONDENTS UNITED NEW JERSEY RAILROAD AND CANAL COMPANY v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT, RESPONDENTS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT, RESPONDENTS HUDSON AND MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT, RESPONDENTS RARITAN RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT, RESPONDENTS LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT, RESPONDENTS ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE STATE BOARD OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENT
- **Court:** Supreme Court of New Jersey
- **Decided:** February 6, 1919
- **Citations:** 92 N.J.L. 648; 106 A. 893; 1919 N.J. LEXIS 239
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8273527

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
The judgments under review in the above stated cases should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance, — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 10.
For reversal — ISTone.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8273527. Public record. Not legal advice.