# Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co.

> Supreme Court of Minnesota · May 22, 2013 · 832 N.W.2d 790

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8246917

## Case

- **Full name:** Jaime RASMUSSEN, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. TWO HARBORS FISH COMPANY d/b/a Lou's Fish House
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Minnesota
- **Decided:** May 22, 2013
- **Citations:** 832 N.W.2d 790; 97 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,844; 118 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 790; 2013 Minn. LEXIS 274; 2013 WL 2221487
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part
- **Judges:** Anderson, Gildea, Paul, Wright
- **Cited by:** 69 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8246917

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating that appellate courts review the district court’s factual findings for clear error, examining the record to determine if it contains reasonable evidence to support the district court’s findings
- concluding that remand is unnecessary if the evidence supports only one result (citing Pullman-Standard, 456 U.S. at 292, 102 S.Ct. 1781)
- holding that appellate courts examine evidence in light most favorable to district court’s findings
- finding no individual liability under MHRA in unfair employment context

## Opinion text

PAGE, Justice
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I join in the concurrence and dissent of Justice Paul H. Anderson.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8246917. Public record. Not legal advice.