# State v. Munt

> Supreme Court of Minnesota · May 31, 2013 · 831 N.W.2d 569

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8246884

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Minnesota v. Joel Marvin MUNT
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Minnesota
- **Decided:** May 31, 2013
- **Citations:** 831 N.W.2d 569; 2013 Minn. LEXIS 311; 2013 WL 2364090
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Andersonpaul
- **Judges:** Anderson, Dietzen, Paul, Wright
- **Cited by:** 47 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8246884

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- rejecting the argument that the judge’s scheduling comments demonstrated actual or apparent bias by showing that he considered the defendant guilty before jury deliberation
- explaining that a person’s “demeanor plays a fundamental role” in determining “credibility”
- concluding that a juror had not expressed actual bias
- declining to address appellant’s claims because he “fail[ed] to cite any evidence in the record or legal authority to support” them

## Opinion text

ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice
(dissenting).
I join in the dissent of Justice Wright.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8246884. Public record. Not legal advice.