# Dharmesh Jain v. Co. Board of Arlington Co. VA

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 22, 2022

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8209239

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 22, 2022
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8209239

## Opinion text

USCA4 Appeal: 20-2166 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2166

DHARMESH JAIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COUNTY BOARD OF ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA, the Governing Body
for the County,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00560-CMH-IDD)

Submitted: August 31, 2022 Decided: September 22, 2022

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dharmesh Jain, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Margaret Sadler, ARLINGTON COUNTY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 20-2166 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Dharmesh Jain appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to his

former employer, the County Board of Arlington County, Virginia, on his employment

discrimination claims raised pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.

§§ 12101-12213. We review the district court’s summary judgment ruling de novo,

“applying the same legal standards as the district court and viewing all facts and reasonable

inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” Ballengee v. CBS Broad.,

Inc., 968 F.3d 344, 349 (4th Cir. 2020).

Upon review of the record, we discern no reversible error in the district court’s

conclusion that Jain failed to establish sufficient prima facie evidence to support his claims.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Jain v. Cnty Bd. of Arlington Cnty.,

No. 1:19-cv-00560-CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. Sept. 28, 2020). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8209239. Public record. Not legal advice.