# Johnnie Jones, Jr. v. Karen Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 13, 2022

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8206514

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 13, 2022
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8206514

## Opinion text

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7649 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/13/2022 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7649

JOHNNIE NELL JONES, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KAREN BROWN, Chairwoman, Virginia Department of Corrections; HAROLD
CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; DOE #1, Parole Board
Member, in their individual capacity; DOE #2, Parole Board Member, in their
individual capacity; DOE #3, Parole Board Member, in their individual capacity;
DOE #4, Parole Board Member, in their individual capacity; DOE #5, Parole Board
Member, in their individual capacity; DOE #6, Parole Board Member, in their
individual capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:20-cv-00331-HEH-EWH)

Submitted: August 2, 2022 Decided: September 13, 2022

Before QUATTLEBAUM and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnnie Nell Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
USCA4 Appeal: 21-7649 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/13/2022 Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2
USCA4 Appeal: 21-7649 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/13/2022 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:

Johnnie Nell Jones, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 action as barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Jones v. Brown, No. 3:20-cv-00331-HEH-EWH (E.D.

Va. Nov. 10, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8206514. Public record. Not legal advice.