# Ronald Emrit v. Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · September 12, 2022

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8206156

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** September 12, 2022
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8206156

## Opinion text

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1316 Doc: 8 Filed: 09/12/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1316

RONALD SATISH EMRIT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS (BIA); CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION
SERVICES (CIS); CUSTOMS AND BORDER PATROL (CBP); STATE
DEPARTMENT; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS),

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (3:22-cv-00008-NKM)

Submitted: September 8, 2022 Decided: September 12, 2022

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-1316 Doc: 8 Filed: 09/12/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Satish Emrit noted this appeal after he filed his complaint in the district court

but before the court entered any order. Therefore, there is no order before us for review.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8206156. Public record. Not legal advice.