# Black v. Brown

> United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · June 4, 1997 · 10 Vet. App. 279

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8167242

## Case

- **Full name:** Patrick F. BLACK, Jr. v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary Of Veterans Affairs
- **Court:** United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
- **Decided:** June 4, 1997
- **Citations:** 10 Vet. App. 279; 1997 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 399; 1997 WL 294493
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Kramersteinberg
- **Judges:** Farley, Holdaway, Ivers, Kramer, Nebeker, Steinberg
- **Cited by:** 9 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8167242

## Opinion text

KRAMER and STEINBERG,
Judges, dissenting:
For the reasons set forth in Judge Kramer’s dissenting opinion to the panel opinion and because we believe that the panel opinion departs from the Court’s established precedent we voted for en banc review. See U.S. Vet.App. 35(c) (full Court review to “maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions”). We believe that the case should be remanded for adjudication of the appellant’s well-grounded claim.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8167242. Public record. Not legal advice.