# Tulingan v. Brown

> United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · January 30, 1997 · 10 Vet. App. 43

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8167173

## Case

- **Full name:** Esdras S. TULINGAN v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
- **Court:** United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
- **Decided:** January 30, 1997
- **Citations:** 10 Vet. App. 43; 1997 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 91; 1997 WL 35191
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Farley, Holdaway, Ivers, Kramer, Nebeker, Steinberg
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8167173

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On October 24, 1996, a panel of the Court affirmed the Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision on appeal. Tulingan v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 484 (1996). On December 17, 1996, the Court granted the appellant’s motion for an extension of time, until December 31, 1996, to file a motion for review en banc. On January 8, 1997, the appellant filed a motion for review by the Court en bane, out of time.
Upon consideration of the foregoing, the record on appeal, and the appellant’s motion for review en banc, and it not appearing that review en banc is necessary either to address a question of exceptional importance to the administration of laws affecting veterans’ benefits or to secure or maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions, it is
ORDERED that the motion for en banc review is accepted for filing as of the date of this order. It is further
ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for review by the Court en banc is DENIED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8167173. Public record. Not legal advice.