# Floyd v. Brown

> United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · July 15, 1996 · 9 Vet. App. 253

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8167080

## Case

- **Full name:** Charles E. FLOYD v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
- **Court:** United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
- **Decided:** July 15, 1996
- **Citations:** 9 Vet. App. 253; 1996 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 468; 1996 WL 407256
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Farley, Holdaway, Ivers, Kramer, Nebeker, Steinberg
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8167080

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On April 17, 1992, this Court affirmed in part and vacated in part the Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision on appeal, and remanded the matter for readjudication. On May 8, 1996, the Secretary filed a motion for reconsideration by panel and by the Court en banc. Upon consideration of the Secretary’s motion for reconsideration, it is
ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration by panel is denied. It is
ORDERED that it not appearing that review en banc is necessary either to address a question of exceptional importance to the administration of laws affecting veterans benefits or to secure or maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions, it is
ORDERED that the Secretary’s motion for review by the Court en banc is denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8167080. Public record. Not legal advice.