# Teague v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · July 30, 2014 · 264 Or. App. 464

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8127320

## Case

- **Full name:** MARK S. TEAGUE v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** July 30, 2014
- **Citations:** 264 Or. App. 464; 332 P.3d 370; 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 1023; 2014 WL 3746487
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Devore, Garrett, Ortega
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8127320

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM
As allowed by ORS 183.400, petitioner seeks a judicial determination of the validity of OAR 255-094-0006(2)(d), a rule adopted by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board). That rule requires “active supervision to the expiration of the indeterminate sentences” for those individuals convicted of certain sex offenses. Petitioner contends that the board exceeded its statutory authority when it adopted the rule because, according to him, ORS 144.085 and ORS 144.103 do not authorize active supervision. We find petitioner’s argument unavailing and conclude that the board did not exceed its authority in adopting OAR 255-094-0006(2)(d).
OAR 255-094-0006(2)(d) held valid.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8127320. Public record. Not legal advice.