# Wilhelmina Moore v. Williamsburg County School District

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 23, 2012

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/804978

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 23, 2012
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/804978

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1144

WILHELMINA MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT; WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY
SCHOOL BOARD; RALPH FENNELL, JR., Superintendent; RUMELL
TAYLOR, Principal; BETTY R. MCKNIGHT; PEPPER RAY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:08-cv-03800-TLW)

Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 23, 2012

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilhelmina Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Lynwood Brown,
Carol Brittian Ervin, Brian Quisenberry, YOUNG CLEMENT RIVERS,
LLP, Charleston, South Carolina; Helen Tyler McFadden, Cades,
South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Wilhelmina Moore appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on her Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Moore v. Williamsburg Cnty. Sch. Dist., No.

4:08-cv-03800-TLW (D.S.C. Jan. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/804978. Public record. Not legal advice.