# United States v. Nacoe Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · July 3, 2012

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/803620

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** July 3, 2012
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/803620

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6757

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NACOE RAY BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:01-cr-00377-JFM-1)

Submitted: June 20, 2012 Decided: July 3, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nacoe Ray Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Slaymaker Sale,
Assistant United States Attorney, Mark Walter Crooks, Stephen
Schenning, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Nacoe Ray Brown appeals the district court’s order

denying his post-judgment motion requesting discovery. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v.

Brown, No. 1:01-cr-00377-JFM-1 (D. Md. Apr. 9, 2012). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/803620. Public record. Not legal advice.