# Frost v. Schinkel

> Nebraska Supreme Court · October 29, 1931 · 121 Neb. 784

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8034997

## Case

- **Full name:** William H. Frost v. Elmer Schinkel, appellants: Rudolph J. Suchan
- **Court:** Nebraska Supreme Court
- **Decided:** October 29, 1931
- **Citations:** 121 Neb. 784; 238 N.W. 659; 77 A.L.R. 1381; 1931 Neb. LEXIS 236
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Rose
- **Judges:** Day, Dean, Eberly, Good, Goss, Paine, Rose
- **Cited by:** 32 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8034997

## Opinion text

Rose, J.
I think the judgment pronounced is right, but I do not *815 concur in the opinion adopted by the supreme court. To a great extent it contains discussions and rules of law not essential to a decision. What is said on extraneous subjects is dicta not binding on the court or parties in future litigation. The effect is to obscure the decisive points in the case and to unnecessarily increase the cost of publishing the official reports of decisions.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8034997. Public record. Not legal advice.