# State v. Wade

> Supreme Court of Missouri · January 4, 1915 · 263 Mo. 262

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8019098

## Case

- **Full name:** State v. DAVID WADE
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Missouri
- **Decided:** January 4, 1915
- **Citations:** 263 Mo. 262; 172 S.W. 354; 1915 Mo. LEXIS 142
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Eoy
- **Judges:** Cueiam, Eoy, Williams
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8019098

## Opinion text

EOY, C.
A jury convicted defendant of taking Elsie Brown, a female person under eighteen years of age, from her father, Harry E. Brown, in legal charge of the person of said Elsie, without the father’s consent, for purposes of concubinage. His punishment was fixed at two years in the penitentiary.
Hon. Carr McNatt, the regular judge, was disqualified by defendant’s application for a change of venue from him, and Judge B. G. Thurman of the 26th Judicial Circuit was called in and tried the case.
The record proper makes no mention of the filing or overruling of the motion for a new trial, and for that reason we are without authority to pass upon matters contained in the bill of exceptions, but are confined to the record proper. It was so held by Faris, J., in the recent case of State v. Scobee, 255 Mo. 270 .
The information was filed September 20,1913, and is sufficient in form and substance. We have carefully examined the record proper and find no error therein.
The judgment is affirmed.
Williams, G., concurs.
PEE CUEIAM.
The foregoing opinion of Eoy, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.
All.the judges concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/8019098. Public record. Not legal advice.