# Netter v. Bowman

> Michigan Court of Appeals · September 19, 2006 · 272 Mich. App. 289

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7960744

## Case

- **Full name:** NETTER v. BOWMAN
- **Court:** Michigan Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** September 19, 2006
- **Citations:** 272 Mich. App. 289; 725 N.W.2d 353
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Wilder
- **Judges:** Hoekstra, Whitbeck, Wilder
- **Cited by:** 10 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7960744

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that “the current meaning of ‘objectively manifested’ .. . requires that a plaintiffs injury must be capable of objective verification”

## Opinion text

WILDER, J.,
(concurring). I join with the majority in determining that the trial court erred by concluding that Netter’s injuries impaired her general ability to lead a normal life, and, therefore, I agree that summary disposition was correctly granted in favor of Bowman. Accordingly, I would not address the question whether Netter suffered a serious impairment of body function.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7960744. Public record. Not legal advice.