# Bara v. Personnel Appeal Board

> Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · December 19, 1973 · 30 Conn. Supp. 333

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7865789

## Case

- **Full name:** Thaddeus J. Bara v. Personnel Appeal Board of the State of Connecticut
- **Court:** Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas
- **Decided:** December 19, 1973
- **Citations:** 30 Conn. Supp. 333
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Kinmonth
- **Judges:** Kinmonth
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7865789

## Opinion text

Kinmonth, J.
The plaintiff’s appeal from the defendant hoard is in two counts. The demurrer to the first count is on the ground that it fails to allege facts sufficient to justify a nullification or reversal of the defendant’s decision. A prayer for relief is demurred to on the ground that the court lacks jurisdiction to grant declaratory relief in this proceeding.
The first, count alleges that the defendant hoard, which heard the plaintiff’s appeal from his dismissal on February 8, 1973, and March 8, 1973, failed to render its decision within ninety days from the date of the hearing as required by § 5-202 (c) of the General Statutes. If it is assumed that the board did not render its decision within ninety days, the failure of the board to do so would not constitute a ground for invalidating its decision. Romano v. Connecticut State Welfare Dept., 4 Conn. Cir. Ct. 138,143 .
*334 As to the ground of demurrer that the court lacks jurisdiction to grant a declaratory judgment, § 4-183 (g) of the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (General Statutes, c. 54) empowers the court to affirm, reverse, or modify an agency’s decision or to remand the case to the agency for further proceedings. An appeal from an administrative agency is a special statutory proceeding and not a “civil action” as is a declaratory judgment ease. Bank Building & Equipment Corporation v. Architectural Examining Board, 153 Conn. 121, 124 .
For the above reasons the demurrer is sustained.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7865789. Public record. Not legal advice.