# Baez v. United States Department of Justice

> Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · July 30, 1982 · 684 F.2d 999

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7849136

## Case

- **Full name:** Joan BAEZ v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- **Decided:** July 30, 1982
- **Citations:** 684 F.2d 999; 221 U.S. App. D.C. 477; 34 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 746; 8 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2185; 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16977
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Tammwright
- **Judges:** Edwards, Ginsburg, MacKinnon, Mikva, Robb, Robinson, Tamm, Wald, Wilkey, Wright
- **Cited by:** 76 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7849136

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- emphasizing that in light of the “powerful” presumption in favor of awarding costs to a prevailing party, “trial judges have rarely denied costs to a prevailing party whose conduct has not been vexatious when the losing party has been capable of paying such costs”
- noting that federal courts “have placed on the unsuccessful parties some burden of showing circumstances sufficient to overcome the presumption favoring the prevailing party”

## Opinion text

TAMM, Circuit Judge, with whom J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Circuit Judge,
joins, dissenting:
Despite the excellent reasoning set forth in the majority opinion in this case, I nevertheless am of the view that, considering all of the factual circumstances involved in this situation, each side should bear its own costs.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7849136. Public record. Not legal advice.