# Liljedahl Bros. v. Grigsby

> Supreme Court of Connecticut · June 12, 1990 · 215 Conn. 345

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7841344

## Case

- **Full name:** Liljedahl Brothers, Inc. v. James A. Grigsby
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Connecticut
- **Decided:** June 12, 1990
- **Citations:** 215 Conn. 345; 576 A.2d 149; 1990 Conn. LEXIS 192
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Shea
- **Judges:** Peters, Shea
- **Cited by:** 571 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7841344

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that a court will not grant a motion to strike that imparts facts outside of the pleadings

## Opinion text

Shea, J.,
with whom Callahan, J., joins, dissenting. For the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in Barrett Builders v. Miller, 215 Conn. 316 , 576 A.2d 455 (1990), I also dissent in this case, which further illustrates the inequity of imposing the penalty of forfeiture upon a tradesman who performs a home improvement without a contract conforming to General Statutes § 20-429.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7841344. Public record. Not legal advice.