# Hill v. Carter

> Supreme Court of Arkansas · June 3, 2004 · 357 Ark. 597

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7827654

## Case

- **Full name:** Robert E. HILL v. Carl CARTER, Crittenden County Election Commission, and Crittenden County Democratic Party
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Arkansas
- **Decided:** June 3, 2004
- **Citations:** 357 Ark. 597; 184 S.W.3d 431; 2004 Ark. LEXIS 361
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Glaze
- **Judges:** Brown, Dickey, Glaze
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7827654

## Opinion text

Tom Glaze, Justice, concurring. I concur with the result ticby e, majority. However, to the extent the majority opinion relies on Whitley v. Cranford, 354 Ark. 253 , 119 S.W.3d 28 (2003), I strongly disagree. The Whitley decision is completely in conflict with Files v. Hill, 268 Ark. 106 , 594 S.W.2d 836 (1980), and should be overruled. In her dissenting opinion in Whitley, Justice Imber set forth the correct analysis, explaining why the Whitley decision is wrong.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7827654. Public record. Not legal advice.