# Bohannan v. Underwood

> Supreme Court of Arkansas · October 2, 1989 · 300 Ark. 110

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7824278

## Case

- **Full name:** Pamela BOHANNAN v. Carol UNDERWOOD and Cecil B. Underwood
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Arkansas
- **Decided:** October 2, 1989
- **Citations:** 300 Ark. 110; 776 S.W.2d 827; 1989 Ark. LEXIS 424
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Purtle
- **Judges:** Dudley, Glaze, Purtle
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7824278

## Opinion text

John I. Purtle, Justice, concurring. I agree that the issue is being raised for the first time on appeal, and therefore, we should not consider the matter. However, that does not imply error. The answer given by the plaintiff was proper for the purpose of showing the reason plaintiff was no longer receiving medical treatment. It went to show the extent of her injuries. It was not a general statement of pecuniary condition, and accordingly, was a proper answer.
I concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7824278. Public record. Not legal advice.