# McAllister v. Forrest City Street Improvement District No. 11

> Supreme Court of Arkansas · December 14, 1981 · 274 Ark. 372

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7821935

## Case

- **Full name:** M. M. MCALLISTER v. FORREST CITY STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 11
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Arkansas
- **Decided:** December 14, 1981
- **Citations:** 274 Ark. 372; 626 S.W.2d 194; 1981 Ark. LEXIS 1494
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Hickman
- **Judges:** Adkisson, Hickman, Purtle
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7821935

## Opinion text

Darrell Hickman, Justice, concurring. I agree with the result in this case but to avoid any confusion state that I understand the majority’s holding to be:
1. The trial court is affirmed in refusing to void the Improvement District.
2. The case is reversed and remanded to permit the appellants to proceed on two alternative prayers for relief.
(a) That the court consider entering an order requiring the assessor to retroactively assess land that was wrongfully omitted.
(b) That the court hear a claim for damages to the plaintiffs against those defendants who acted fraudulently as alleged in Paragraph J of the complaint.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7821935. Public record. Not legal advice.