# Pugsley v. Sellmeyer

> Supreme Court of Arkansas · April 9, 1923 · 158 Ark. 247

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7812137

## Case

- **Full name:** Pugsley v. Sellmeyer
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Arkansas
- **Decided:** April 9, 1923
- **Citations:** 158 Ark. 247; 250 S.W. 538; 30 A.L.R. 1212; 1923 Ark. LEXIS 443
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Humphreys
- **Judges:** Hart, Humphreys, Smith
- **Cited by:** 42 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7812137

## Opinion text

Humphreys, J., (concurring). A proper showing has been made to this court that the rule complained of was rescinded after this appeal was perfected. The case is therefore moot. It is entirely unnecessary to determine whether a nonexisting rule is reasonable or unreasonable, hence I refrain from doing so.
Upon this ground alone I concur in the affirmance of the judgment.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7812137. Public record. Not legal advice.