# United States v. Thomas Brown

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · August 30, 2022

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7806138

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** August 30, 2022
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7806138

## Opinion text

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6247 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/30/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6247

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

THOMAS MONTRIL BROWN, a/k/a Sparks,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (4:05-cr-00770-TLW-1)

Submitted: August 18, 2022 Decided: August 30, 2022

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Montril Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Derek Alan Shoemake, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6247 Doc: 7 Filed: 08/30/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Montril Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown,

No. 4:05-cr-00770-TLW-1 (D.S.C. Feb. 22, 2022). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7806138. Public record. Not legal advice.