# OMAR RICARDO BROWN v. LARS SEVERSON, etc.

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · August 3, 2022

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7797360

## Case

- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** August 3, 2022
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7797360

## Opinion text

Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida

Opinion filed August 3, 2022.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1794
Lower Tribunal No. 21-548-K
________________

Omar Ricardo Brown,
Appellant,

vs.

Lars Severson, etc., et al.,
Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Timothy J.
Koenig, Judge.

Omar Ricardo Brown, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael W. Mervine, Chief
Assistant Attorney General, for appellee, State of Florida.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and MILLER and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Brown v. State, 302 So. 3d 874, 874 (Fla. 3d DCA

2020); Breedlove v. Singletary, 595 So. 2d 8, 10 (Fla. 1992) (“Habeas corpus

is not a second appeal and cannot be used to litigate or relitigate issues

which could have been, should have been, or were raised on direct appeal.”);

Jackson v. State, 1 So. 3d 273, 278 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (“Even when a

Fourth Amendment violation has occurred, evidence should be suppressed

only if it ‘has been come at by exploitation of the illegality’ and was not

obtained ‘by means sufficiently distinguishable to be purged of the primary

taint.’” (quoting Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 488 (1963))).

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7797360. Public record. Not legal advice.