# A.G. v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · November 2, 2007 · 989 So. 2d 1167

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7793812

## Case

- **Full name:** A.G. v. STATE of Alabama
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
- **Decided:** November 2, 2007
- **Citations:** 989 So. 2d 1167
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Baschab
- **Judges:** Baschab, McMillan, Shaw, Welch, Wise
- **Cited by:** 34 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7793812

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that postconviction claim *1160 that trial counsel was ineffective for not cross-examining eight-year-old victim was insufficiently pleaded where petitioner “failed to plead any facts indicating that counsel’s decision not to cross-examine the eight-year-old victim was…
- holding that postconviction claim that trial counsel was ineffective for not cross-examining eight-year-old victim was insufficiently pleaded where petitioner “failed to plead any facts indicating that counsel’s decision not to cross-examine the eight-year-old victim was not s…
- holding that ineffective-assistance claims were insufficiently pleaded when the petitioner did not plead what questions should have been asked and "how those questions" would have resulted 125 CR-2023-0206 in favorable testimony
- holding that ineffective-assistance claims were insufficiently pleaded when petitioner did not plead what questions should have been asked and "how those questions" would have resulted 130 CR-2023-0206 in favorable testimony

## Opinion text

BASCHAB, Presiding Judge,
concurring in part and concurring in the result in part.
For the reasons set forth in my special concurrence in Clemons v. State, [Ms. CR-01-1355, November 2, 2007] — So.2d - (Ala.Crim.App.2007), I respectfully concur in the result as to Parts III and IV of the majority opinion. I concur as to the remainder of the majority opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7793812. Public record. Not legal advice.