# T.D.P. v. D.D.P.

> Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · August 4, 2006 · 950 So. 2d 311

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7787355

## Case

- **Full name:** T.D.P. v. D.D.P. and W.H.P.
- **Court:** Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
- **Decided:** August 4, 2006
- **Citations:** 950 So. 2d 311
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Murdock
- **Judges:** Pittman, Thompson, Bryan, Crawley, Murdock
- **Cited by:** 18 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7787355

## Opinion text

MURDOCK, Judge,
concurring in the result.
I concur in the result. I write separately for the purpose of noting that on remand, the juvenile court, if it has not *317 already done so while this case has been on appeal, must determine as a threshold matter whether the state of dependency that it found to exist in its October 21, 2005, judgment continues to exist. Based on the evidence presented at the last hearing conducted by the juvenile court, it certainly is foreseeable that the children no longer are dependent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7787355. Public record. Not legal advice.