# Childers v. State

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · February 2, 2006 · 931 So. 2d 86

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7782960

## Case

- **Full name:** Wyon Dale CHILDERS, Appellant/Cross-Appellee v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Cross-Appellant
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** February 2, 2006
- **Citations:** 931 So. 2d 86; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17207; 2006 WL 237081
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Browning
- **Judges:** Allen, Benton, Browning, Davis, Ervin, Hawkes, Kahn, Lewis, Nortwick, Padovano, Polston, Thomas, Webster, Wolf
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7782960

## Opinion text

BROWNING, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur with the majority that this case presents a question of “great public importance” that justifies its en banc consideration; however, I concur fully with Chief Judge Kahn’s opinion on the merits of the issues, as the majority opinion unduly restricts the Appellant’s right of cross-examination contrary to a host of controlling cases, and violates Appellant’s constitutional rights to confront his accuser, to trial by jury, and to due process of law. (Such cases are cited and Appellant’s constitutional rights are fully and fairly discussed in other opinions, and in the interest of brevity, I refrain from further discussion of such issues.)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7782960. Public record. Not legal advice.