# Cox Communications v. Tommy Bowman Roofing, LLC

> Louisiana Court of Appeal · March 15, 2006 · 929 So. 2d 161

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7782229

## Case

- **Full name:** COX COMMUNICATIONS v. TOMMY BOWMAN ROOFING, LLC and Colony Insurance Company
- **Court:** Louisiana Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** March 15, 2006
- **Citations:** 929 So. 2d 161; 2006 La. App. LEXIS 927; 2006 WL 1047128
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Tobias
- **Judges:** Cannizzaro, Kirby, Lombard, Murray, Reasons, Tobias
- **Cited by:** 16 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7782229

## Opinion text

TOBIAS, J.,
dissents in part and assigns reasons.
hi respectfully dissent in part. I do not find that Cox Communication’s employment of Legier & Materne to verify whether Cox sustained any losses as a result of the 3-hour evacuation was unreasonable under the circumstances. The CPA firm’s determination was warranted lest Cox be accused by the defendants of fabricating or embellishing the calculated loss made by Mr. Elvin Thibodeaux. I would therefore award the $14,608.73 fees of Legier & Materne.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7782229. Public record. Not legal advice.