# Office of Insurance Regulation v. AIU Insurance

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · April 24, 2006 · 926 So. 2d 479

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7781478

## Case

- **Full name:** OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION v. AIU INSURANCE COMPANY, American Home Assurance Company, American International South Insurance Company
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** April 24, 2006
- **Citations:** 926 So. 2d 479; 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5851; 2006 WL 1058169
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Barfield, Browning, Thomas
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7781478

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
The Administrative Law Judge erred in concluding that the appellees had demonstrated standing to challenge proposed rule 690-170.013(7), Fla. Admin. Code. While the interests of the appellees are arguably within the zone of interests to be regulated by the proposed rule, the appel-lees did not demonstrate that application of the proposed rule will result in a real and sufficiently immediate injury in fact to afford them standing to challenge the proposed rule. See Florida Board of Medicine v. Florida Academy of Cosmetic Surgery, Inc., 808 So.2d 243 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). The other issues are mooted by this determination. The final order is REVERSED.
BARFIELD, BROWNING, and THOMAS, JJ., Concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7781478. Public record. Not legal advice.