# District Board of Trustees v. Morgan

> Supreme Court of Florida · December 15, 2005 · 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 164

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7779172

## Case

- **Full name:** The DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES, etc. v. Don R. MORGAN, etc.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Florida
- **Decided:** December 15, 2005
- **Citations:** 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 164; 918 So. 2d 273; 2005 Fla. LEXIS 2551; 2005 WL 3429760
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Anstead, Bell, Cantero, Lewis, Pariente, Quince, Wells
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7779172

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review District Board of Trustees v. Morgan, 890 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), a decision by the Fifth District Court of Appeal certifying conflict with the First District Court of Appeal’s decision in O’Kon & Co. v. Riedel, 588 So.2d 1025 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have now determined that Morgan and O’Kon & Co. are factually distinct so that the decisions are not in conflict and may live side-by-side in the law of Florida. We therefore exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7779172. Public record. Not legal advice.