# Jackson v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · March 18, 2005 · 910 So. 2d 797

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7777685

## Case

- **Full name:** Ex Parte State of Alabama. (In Re Shonelle Andre Jackson v. State of Alabama).
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
- **Decided:** March 18, 2005
- **Citations:** 910 So. 2d 797; 2005 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 61; 2005 WL 628485
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Shaw
- **Judges:** McMillan, Cobb, Baschab, Wise, Shaw
- **Cited by:** 19 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7777685

## Opinion text

SHAW, Judge,
concurring in part and concurring in the result.
I concur in Parts I through VIII of the main opinion and I concur in the result reached in the opinion. I do not, however, agree with the rationale in Part IX. As I understand the main opinion, the trial court is directed to vacate its rulings on the two discovery motions and to reconsider Jackson’s discovery requests in light of the applicable law cited in the opinion and by applying the appropriate “good cause” standard discussed in Ex parte Land, 775 So.2d 847 (Ala.2000), and Ex parte Mack, 894 So.2d 764 (Ala.Crim.App.2003).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7777685. Public record. Not legal advice.