# Montgomery Beverage Company, Inc. v. Norris

> Supreme Court of Alabama · April 2, 2004 · 890 So. 2d 1017

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7772413

## Case

- **Full name:** MONTGOMERY BEVERAGE COMPANY, INC., d/b/a Mobile Beer and Wine Company v. Robert C. NORRIS, Sr.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** April 2, 2004
- **Citations:** 890 So. 2d 1017; 2004 Ala. LEXIS 78; 2004 WL 692146
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Houston, See, Lyons, Brown, Johnstone, Harwood, Woodall, Stuart
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7772413

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
Montgomery Beverage Company, Inc., d/b/a Mobile Beer and Wine Company, petitioned this Court, pursuant to Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P., for permission to appeal from the denial of its motion for a partial summary judgment. This Court granted permission to appeal.
In light of this Court’s opinion in Byrd v. Dillard’s, Inc., [Ms. 1021439, April 2, 2004] — So.2d-(Ala.2004), the trial court’s order denying the motion for a partial summary judgment in this case no longer “involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion.” Rule 5(a), Ala. R.App. P. Thus, we dismiss the appeal.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7772413. Public record. Not legal advice.