# In re Gerdes

> Supreme Court of Louisiana · March 12, 2004 · 869 So. 2d 106

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7765767

## Case

- **Full name:** In re Louis A. GERDES, Jr.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Louisiana
- **Decided:** March 12, 2004
- **Citations:** 869 So. 2d 106; 2004 WL 538750
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Calogero
- **Judges:** Calogero, Johnson, Reasons
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7765767

## Opinion text

CALOGERO, C.J.,
dissents and assigns reasons.
I dissent from the sanction imposed in this case. I would impose a suspension of *114 three months, which I consider a sufficient penalty for this respondent’s conduct. The respondent practices in an urban area with many disadvantaged clients, and while that fact does not excuse his conduct, it helps to explain, perhaps, his error in taking on cases of questionable merit. Furthermore, as the majority concedes, none of the respondent’s transgressions is particularly egregious, and the respondent did not act with a dishonest or improper motive. Moreover, the respondent through counsel has asserted that he has taken steps to avoid future problems regarding the filing of non-meritorious lawsuits. Accordingly, in my view a three-month suspension would be an appropriate sanction.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7765767. Public record. Not legal advice.