# Haston ex rel. Haston v. C.F. Vigor High School

> Supreme Court of Alabama · March 14, 2003 · 866 So. 2d 1115

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7765108

## Case

- **Full name:** Ex parte Russell HUDSON. (In re Duane Haston, Jr., by and through his father and next friend, Duane Haston, Sr., and Duane Haston, Sr. v. C.F. Vigor High School, Mobile County School Board of Commissioners, Garner & Associates, Inc., and Interkal, Inc.)
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** March 14, 2003
- **Citations:** 866 So. 2d 1115; 2003 Ala. LEXIS 78
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Moore
- **Judges:** Brown, Harwood, Houston, Johnstone, Lyons, Moore, See, Stuart, Woodall
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7765108

## Opinion text

MOORE, Chief Justice
(concurring in the result in part and dissenting in part).
I concur in denying the petition for the writ of mandamus as to the issue whether Russell Hudson was negligent or wanton in fading to forward the maintenance manual for the bleachers to the project foreman. I dissent from the granting of the petition for the writ of mandamus as to Duane Haston’s other claims against Hudson. With regard to those claims, I believe mandamus is an improper remedy because another adequate legal remedy— appeal — is available.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7765108. Public record. Not legal advice.