# Plantation South Condominium Ass'n v. Profile Management Corp.

> Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · October 5, 2001 · 842 So. 2d 663

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7758300

## Case

- **Full name:** PLANTATION SOUTH CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. PROFILE MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, INC.
- **Court:** Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
- **Decided:** October 5, 2001
- **Citations:** 842 So. 2d 663; 2001 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 588; 2001 WL 1178669
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Thompson
- **Judges:** Yates, Crawley, Thompson, Pittman, Murdock
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7758300

## Opinion text

THOMPSON, Judge,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur in those portions of the main opinion that affirm portions of the summary judgment in favor of Profile Management. However, I must respectfully dissent from the reversal of a portion of the *670 summary judgment, a reversal based on an issue related to the supervision of the roofing contract. I conclude that this court’s reversal imposes on Profile Management an obligation to guarantee the adequacy and workmanship of the roofing contractor’s work. The contract between the parties does not impose such a guarantee.
PITTMAN, J., concurs.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7758300. Public record. Not legal advice.