# Brown v. State

> Supreme Court of Alabama · June 15, 2001 · 807 So. 2d 17

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7747892

## Case

- **Full name:** Ex Parte Raymond Eugene Brown. (In Re: Raymond Eugene Brown v. State).
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** June 15, 2001
- **Citations:** 807 So. 2d 17; 2001 Ala. LEXIS 220; 2001 WL 670505
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Harwood
- **Judges:** Harwood, Houston, See, Lyons, Brown, Woodall, Stuart, Johnstone, Moore
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7747892

## Opinion text

HARWOOD, Justice.
In quashing the writ, we should not be understood as agreeing with what the Court of Criminal Appeals wrote regarding the proper standard to be applied in cases determining whether prejudice has occurred. See Roan v. State, 225 Ala. 428 , 143 So. 454 (1932); Reed v. State, 547 So.2d 596 (Ala.1989); Union Mortg. Co. v. Barlow, 595 So.2d 1335 (Ala.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 906 , 113 S.Ct. 301 , 121 L.Ed.2d 224 (1992); Ex parte Stewart, 659 So.2d 122 (Ala.1993); Campbell v. Williams, 638 So.2d 804 (Ala.1994); Dawson v. State, 710 So.2d 472 (Ala.1997); and Ex parte Apicella, 809 So.2d 865 (Ala.2001).
In addition, the facts of this case are distinguishable from the facts presented in Ex parte Pierce, [Ms. 1981270, September 1, 2000] — So.2d-(Ala.2000). Compare Ex parte Dobyne, 805 So.2d 763 (Ala.2001).
WRIT QUASHED.
HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, BROWN, WOODALL, and STUART, JJ., concur.
JOHNSTONE, J., concurs specially.
MOORE, C.J., concurs in the result.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7747892. Public record. Not legal advice.