# Tuohy v. State

> Supreme Court of Alabama · June 30, 2000 · 776 So. 2d 902

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7738322

## Case

- **Full name:** Ex Parte Joseph Edward Tuohy. (Re: Joseph Edward Tuohy v. State).
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** June 30, 2000
- **Citations:** 776 So. 2d 902; 2000 Ala. LEXIS 284; 2000 WL 869566
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Hooper, Maddox, Cook, See, Lyons, Brown, Houston, Johnstone, England
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7738322

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is quashed as having been improvidently granted.
In quashing the writ, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782 , 280 So.2d 155 (1973).
WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, COOK, SEE, LYONS, and BROWN, JJ., concur.
HOUSTON, JOHNSTONE, and ENGLAND, JJ., dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7738322. Public record. Not legal advice.