# State v. Brown

> Louisiana Court of Appeal · July 12, 2000 · 98 La.App. 4 Cir. 2615

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7737402

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Louisiana v. Spartical J. BROWN
- **Court:** Louisiana Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** July 12, 2000
- **Citations:** 98 La.App. 4 Cir. 2615; 773 So. 2d 742; 2000 La. App. LEXIS 1840; 2000 WL 1024174
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Jones
- **Judges:** Bagneris, Jjbagneris, Jones, Plotkin
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7737402

## Opinion text

11 JONES, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I agree that it was error not to have granted Brown’s motion to suppress the evidence. Thus, I also agree that we should vacate the conviction and remand for a new trial.
However, I do not agree that we should consider the merits of the evidence presented and its sufficiency. Therefore, I would vacate Brown’s conviction and sentence, remand for a new trial, and preter-mit discussion of the other assignments of error raised in her appeal.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7737402. Public record. Not legal advice.