# Siuzdak v. Poe & Brown, Inc.

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · February 9, 2000 · 765 So. 2d 57

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7734312

## Case

- **Full name:** Diane SIUZDAK v. POE & BROWN, INC., f/k/a Poe & Associates, Inc.
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** February 9, 2000
- **Citations:** 765 So. 2d 57; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1045; 2000 WL 140439
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Farmer, Hazouri, Stevenson
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7734312

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
Diane Siuzdak appeals from a final summary judgment entered for her former employer, Poe & Brown, Inc., on her four-count complaint for sexual harassment and discrimination. The trial court granted Poe & Brown, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment finding that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact.
In determining whether there are any genuine issues of material fact, all inferences are viewed in favor of the non-moving party and the moving party must conclusively show that there is no genuine issue of material fact. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966). A review of the record on appeal indicates that there are indeed genuine issues of material fact as to whether Siuzdak was subjected to sexual harassment by her supervisor and whether she suffered a demotion or undesirable reassignment as a result. We therefore reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.
FARMER, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7734312. Public record. Not legal advice.