# Brown v. State

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · August 21, 1998 · 715 So. 2d 1142

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7715737

## Case

- **Full name:** Daryl L. BROWN v. STATE of Florida
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** August 21, 1998
- **Citations:** 715 So. 2d 1142; 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10478; 1998 WL 518538
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Griffin
- **Judges:** Antoon, Dauksch, Griffin
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7715737

## Opinion text

GRIFFIN, Chief Judge.
The defendant was convicted of three offenses in 1990: burglary of a dwelling, grand theft and dealing in stolen property. He had a substantial prior felony record. Defendant was given a guidelines sentence on counts I and II and a habitual offender sentence on count III. The scoresheet erroneously scored the count III offense as the primary offense at conviction. The defendant filed a Rule 3.800 motion to correct the scoring error and was granted relief. The scoresheet was recalculated and he was resentenced on counts I and II. The defendant contends that he was also entitled to be resentenced on count III because the erroneous scoresheet used for counts I and II may somehow have affected the sentencing decision on count III. We find this argument to be completely without merit and affirm.
AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7715737. Public record. Not legal advice.