# Brown v. State

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · August 2, 1996 · 680 So. 2d 562

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7700437

## Case

- **Full name:** Barrington BROWN v. STATE of Florida
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** August 2, 1996
- **Citations:** 680 So. 2d 562; 1996 WL 431164
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Blue, Campbell, Schoonover
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7700437

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
Darangton Brown appeals following his conviction and sentences for burglary and two violations of probation. We find merit only in his argument that the trial court erred in imposing a $2 cost pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), because it is a discretionary cost that was not announced at sentencing. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Accordingly, we strike the $2 cost.
Conviction and sentences affirmed; cost stricken.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and BLUE, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7700437. Public record. Not legal advice.