# Brown v. State

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · September 18, 1996 · 679 So. 2d 367

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7699733

## Case

- **Full name:** Richard BROWN v. STATE of Florida
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** September 18, 1996
- **Citations:** 679 So. 2d 367; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9798; 1996 WL 526215
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Glickstein, Gross, Warner
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7699733

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
We affirm both conditions of probation except for that portion of condition eleven (11) that requires random alcohol testing, which we reverse and remand with direction to strike same.
This requirement fails to be reasonably related to the rehabilitation of appellant, bears no relationship to the crime for which appellant was convicted, and relates to conduct that is otherwise legal. See Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734 (Fla.1993); Fernandez v. State, 677 So.2d 332 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7699733. Public record. Not legal advice.