# Crump v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

> Supreme Court of Alabama · June 7, 1996 · 678 So. 2d 140

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7699161

## Case

- **Full name:** Ex Parte Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board. (Re Peggy Harris Crump D/B/A Coal City Grocery v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board).
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** June 7, 1996
- **Citations:** 678 So. 2d 140; 1996 Ala. LEXIS 149; 1996 WL 305656
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Maddox
- **Judges:** Ingram, Hooper, Almon, Shores, Cook, Butts, Maddox, Houston, Kennedy
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7699161

## Opinion text

MADDOX, Justice
(dissenting).
I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to deny the Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board’s petition for writ of certiorari. The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is in direct conflict with this Court’s opinion in Ex parte State of Alabama Alcoholic Bev. Control Bd., 654 So.2d 1149 (Ala.1994), as well as the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435 , 109 S.Ct. 1892 , 104 L.Ed.2d 487 (1989). I agree with the analysis set forth in the dissenting opinion of Judge Crawley. Furthermore, Judge Thigpen in his dissent correctly interpreted Ex parte State of Alabama Alcoholic Bev. Control Bd., supra. Therefore, I would grant certiorari review, and I would reverse the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, on the grounds set forth in those dissents.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7699161. Public record. Not legal advice.