# Tuscaloosa v. Bd, Trust, police/firemen's Pen Fnd

> Supreme Court of Alabama · January 19, 1996 · 677 So. 2d 198

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7698732

## Case

- **Full name:** CITY OF TUSCALOOSA v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the POLICE & FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND CITY OF TUSCALOOSA v. Eddie PUGH Eddie PUGH v. CITY OF TUSCALOOSA BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the FIREMEN'S AND POLICEMEN'S PENSION & RELIEF FUND v. CITY OF TUSCALOOSA
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** January 19, 1996
- **Citations:** 677 So. 2d 198; 1996 Ala. LEXIS 34
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Butts
- **Judges:** Maddox, Shores, Houston, Kennedy, Ingram, Cook, Butts
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7698732

## Opinion text

BUTTS, Justice
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I concur in the affirmance of the trial court’s judgments, except to the extent that it affirms that portion of the judgments holding that the non-claims statute, Ala.Code 1975, § 11-47-23, applied to the plaintiffs’ claim regarding tax revenues from fire insurance premiums. I dissent from the affir-mance of that portion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7698732. Public record. Not legal advice.