# State v. M.C.

> Supreme Court of Florida · July 20, 1995 · 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 354

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7693818

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Florida v. M.C.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Florida
- **Decided:** July 20, 1995
- **Citations:** 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 354; 666 So. 2d 877; 1995 Fla. LEXIS 1162
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Anstead
- **Judges:** Anstead, Grimes, Harding, Kogan, Only, Overton, Shaw, Wells
- **Cited by:** 14 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7693818

## Opinion text

ANSTEAD, Justice,
specially concurring.
Athough I agree with the result reached in the majority opinion, I would prefer a procedure whereby restitution would either be determined and ordered in the original imposition of sanctions, or the trial court could expressly reserve jurisdiction in the original judgment to impose restitution at a later time. We have simply failed, prior to this decision, to make the sixty-day period provided in the criminal rules applicable to juvenile proceedings.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7693818. Public record. Not legal advice.
