# State v. Brown

> Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 4, 1994 · 637 So. 2d 669

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7680502

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Louisiana v. Phillip W. BROWN
- **Court:** Louisiana Court of Appeal
- **Decided:** May 4, 1994
- **Citations:** 637 So. 2d 669; 1994 La. App. LEXIS 1258; 1994 WL 174826
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurring in part by Victory
- **Judges:** Brown, Price, Victory
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7680502

## Opinion text

| /VICTORY, Judge,
concurring in part, dissenting in part.
Although I agree with most of what is said in the majority opinion, the record reflects that the trial court failed to impose a sentence for each of the defendant’s convictions. In my view, we are required to remand the case to the trial court to impose a separate sentence for each conviction. See State v. Craig Jones, 25,753 (La.App. 2d Cir. 03/30/94); State v. Fairley, 597 So.2d 1081 (La.App. 2d Cir.1992); and, State v. Volentine, 565 So.2d 511 (La.App. 2d Cir.1990).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7680502. Public record. Not legal advice.