# Brown v. State

> District Court of Appeal of Florida · September 24, 1993 · 624 So. 2d 405

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7674273

## Case

- **Full name:** Laura BROWN v. STATE of Florida
- **Court:** District Court of Appeal of Florida
- **Decided:** September 24, 1993
- **Citations:** 624 So. 2d 405; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9502; 1993 WL 372170
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Altenbernd, Patterson, Ryder
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7674273

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
Laura Brown appeals her sentences imposed in case number 90-9615, contending the scoresheet contains numerous errors that, if corrected, would result in a lower permitted range. The state has conceded that there are errors in the scoresheet. Accordingly, we reverse Ms. Brown’s sentences in case number 90-9615, and remand for resentencing within the maximum range permitted by the guidelines, after recalculating the scoresheet. In this regard, the trial court should be guided by State v. Tito, 616 So.2d 39 (Fla.1993).
Ms. Brown also contends that the trial court impermissibly extended her probation in case numbers 90-9616, 90-9617, 90-9618, and 90-12265. We do not have jurisdiction to review this issue because Ms. Brown failed to appeal these cases. She may raise this issue in a motion for posteonviction relief.
Case number 90-9615 is reversed and remanded for resentencing.
RYDER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/7674273. Public record. Not legal advice.