# Adefemi v. Ashcroft

> Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · February 24, 2004 · 358 F.3d 828

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/76447

## Case

- **Full name:** Albert ADEFEMI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, as Attorney General of U.S., Ms. Rosemary Melville, as the District Director for INS, United States Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondents-Appellees
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- **Decided:** February 24, 2004
- **Citations:** 358 F.3d 828; 2004 WL 170400
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Barkett, Kravitch, Fullam, Edmondson, Tjoflat, Anderson, Birch, Dubina, Black, Carnes, Hull, Marcus, Wilson
- **Cited by:** 12 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/76447

## Opinion text

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
February 24, 2004
No. 00-15783 THOMAS K. KAHN
CLERK
BIA No. A90-358-688

ALBERT ADEFEMI,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, as Attorney General of U.S.,
Ms. ROSEMARY MELVILLE, as the District
Director for INS,
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND
NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondents-Appellees.

---------------------------
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
--------------------------

(Opinion January 29, 2004, ___ F3.d ___,11th Cir. 2004)

(February 24, 2004)

Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH,
DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON,
Circuit Judges*.

*
Judge William H. Pryor, Jr., became a member of the court on February 20, 2004, and
did not participate in the en banc poll. Judge Phyllis A. Kravitch has elected to participate in
further proceedings.
BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on

whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of

the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a

rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this

court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/76447. Public record. Not legal advice.